Seriously, the first game was released in 2007. It’s not that old, but the design of the game looks older. It’s just poor, to be honest. The camera work is terrible to say the least, you can barely make out what’s happening during the cinematics. I also can’t stand Altair’s voice (and a lot of…
Do us all a favor, and never EVER play another game again in your lifetime.
What you don’t seem to understand you inept moron was that the first assassins creed game was an experiment, they were testing out what worked and what didn’t mainly because it was the first of the series and everything the fan’s didn’t like or what needed improving, they improved in AC2.
The graphics I think are not as bad as you think they are in fact I still think they are pretty good all things considered, besides graphics are not all that there is to a game.
Now if, you had even bothered to listen to the STORY of the first Assassins Creed you’d find it actually one of the most compelling out of the series, its a story about a man who fell from grace and wanted to earn redemption and him facing the consequences of his actions, the story and the characters are what make the game well loved by fans of Assassins Creed; yes the game play is repetitive at times and can be challenging but isn’t that the point of MOST games? To be challenging? Also as I said before Assassins Creed was an experiment and Ubisoft ensured to improve AC2 by listening to the fans feedback which is WHY AC2 has more fan praise then the first one which is severely underrated.
So yeah, do your reserch before you start insulting the first game, I am more than aware of AC1’s flaws but that is what makes it beautiful to me.